Legal Opinion

Doe v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 5, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1807PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.

Plaintiff John Doe brings this action against the U.S. Parole Commission and the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia (“CSOSA”). He challenges the imposition of a “Sex Offender Aftercare [Assessment]” condition on his supervised release, and seeks declaratory and injunctive relief. Now before the Court are Doe’s motion for a preliminary injunction barring enforcement of the assessment condition and defendants’ motion to dismiss in part and for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Doe v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  2. Chandler v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. (Leave of Court is Needed for Plaintiff) Chandler v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. Long v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API