Legal Opinion

Chandler v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 8, 2014No. Civil Action No. 06-0664 (PLF)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr., challenges the United States Parole Commission’s (“USPC”) imposition on his parole of a Special Sex Offender Aftercare Condition. This Condition entailed Chandler’s supervision by a devoted Sex Offender Unit, as well as his assignment to sex offender therapy. Mr. Chandler — imprisoned after his conviction on a plea to robbery, armed robbery, -and assault with a dangerous weapon in the D.C. Superior Court — has never been convicted of a sex crime. He contends that USPC lacks any legal authority to impose…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. (Leave of Court is Needed for Plaintiff) Chandler v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. (Leave of Court is Needed for Plaintiff) Chandler v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  3. (Leave of Court is Needed for Plaintiff) Chandler v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  4. Hamlet v. IrvinDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2024
  5. Long v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API