Chandler v. United States Parole Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr., challenges the United States Parole Commission’s (“USPC”) imposition on his parole of a Special Sex Offender Aftercare Condition. This Condition entailed Chandler’s supervision by a devoted Sex Offender Unit, as well as his assignment to sex offender therapy. Mr. Chandler — imprisoned after his conviction on a plea to robbery, armed robbery, -and assault with a dangerous weapon in the D.C. Superior Court — has never been convicted of a sex crime. He contends that USPC lacks any legal authority to impose…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- (Leave of Court is Needed for Plaintiff) Chandler v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- (Leave of Court is Needed for Plaintiff) Chandler v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- (Leave of Court is Needed for Plaintiff) Chandler v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Hamlet v. IrvinDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2024
- Long v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.