Legal Opinion

Long v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 24, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2014-1290Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________ ) ANTHONY LONG, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 14-1290 (RBW) ) UNITED STATES ) PAROLE COMMISSION, ) ) Respondent. ) __________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION The petitioner, a District of Columbia parolee residing in the District, has filed an action captioned: “Petition for ‘Writ of Habeas Corpus’ D.C. Code 1901(a) and (b)” (“Pet.”) [Dkt. # 1]. 1 He has named the United States Parole Commission (“Commission”) as the respondent because the Commission is responsible for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Swain v. PressleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. David Isaiah Garris v. Charles S. Lindsay, Administrator, Maximum Security FacilityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  4. Williams v. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  5. Gary E. Byrd v. John S. Henderson and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API