Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Peterson's North Branch Mill, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 20, 1993No. C1-93-184PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Mortgagors allege that they were deprived of a foreclosure surplus by the district court’s incorrect application of the mortgage foreclosure proceeds provisions of Minn.Stat. § 580.09 (1986).
FACTS
Appellants Sandra L. Anderson and Robert C. Hozempa mortgaged their farm to Farmer’s Home Administration (FmHA) and respondent Peterson's North Branch Mill, Inc. (Mill). Mill received the junior lien. There were no liens junior to Mill’s lien. Through its attorney, respondent Michael A. Pinotti, Mill foreclosed upon, and purchased for the sum of all mortgage liens on the entire…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Peterson v. First National Bank of CeylonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- TCF Banking & Savings, F.A. v. Loft Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Romkey v. SaumweberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Schwinn v. GriffithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. OanesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- First Minnesota Bank v. Overby Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- United States v. GilmoreDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- State v. OanesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996