Legal Opinion

Schwinn v. Griffith

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 6, 1981No. 50759PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHERAN, Chief Justice.

This case involves a specific performance action initiated by plaintiff/appellant Robert P. Schwinn (appellant) against defendant/respondent Robert T. Griffith (respondent). The action was brought to enforce a purchase agreement for the sale of two lots in Watertown, Minnesota, signed by appellant and his agent Fred W. Radde, that was executed following an auction at which respondent was the high bidder. The district court dismissed the complaint, finding that the statute of frauds governing the sale of real property, Minn.Stat. § 513.05 (1980), required a written…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Royal Realty Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Polka v. MaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Greer v. KooikerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. National Bank of Kentucky v. Louisville Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  5. Lake Company v. MolanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reeves v. PorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Bruce Bergstrom v. Sambo's Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  3. Ag Services of America, Inc. v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  4. Anderson v. Peterson's North Branch Mill, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. McLaughlin v. HeikkilaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API