Legal Opinion
United States v. Gilmore
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 19, 1999No. 3:95 CV 2125 (GLG)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1
GOETTEL, District Judge.
William C. Gilmore and his wife, Cheryl A. Gilmore, are farmers. In 1973, they obtained four loans from the Fanner’s Home Administration (“FmHA”), 2 United States Department of Agriculture. The government now seeks to foreclose a mortgage on the Gilmores’ farm because of defaults on two of the loans. Most of the facts are not in dispute.
Three of the loans were obtained by the Gilmores in May 1973. One in the amount of $20,000 was secured by a mortgage on the farm, (sometimes referred to as the “farm loan” or the “01 loan”), and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fidelity Trust Co. v. IrickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- United States v. General Douglas MacArthur Senior Village, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Wilcox v. BlissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- In Re EarlUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002