Eisensmith v. Buhl Optical Co.
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Litz, Judge:
This suit involves the right of a corporation to practice optometry, in West Virginia, through a registered and licensed optometrist.
W. T. Eisensmith and A. Levit, duly registered and licensed optometrists in this state, suing on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, obtained an injunction against defendants, Buhl Optical Company, a corporation, and O. J. Morrison Department Store Company, a corporation, inhibiting and restraining each of them from practicing optometry through registered and licensed optometrist employees. Defendants have appealed.
The Buhl…
2Cited by27 opinions
- McMurdo v. GetterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Dvorine v. Castelberg Jewelry Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Ezell v. RitholzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- Neill v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Seifert v. Buhl Optical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.