Murgatroyd v. Dudley
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
This suit is one for malpractice against Dr. Homer D. Dudley and his wife. Dr. Dudley, being the principal actor in the matter, for brevity, will he mentioned in the singular number.
Respondent recovered a verdict for fifteen thousand dollars. On hearing' the motion of appellant for a new trial, the trial court reduced the verdict to ten thousand dollars, or, in the alternative, granted a new trial in case the reduction was not accepted by respondent. Respondent remitted five thousand dollars, upon which judgment was entered against appellant for ten thousand dollars.
These facts are not in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. ReinhartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- McCormick v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Wright v. UpsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Lund v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Wilcox v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Borowski v. Von SolbrigAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Spalding v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.