Legal Opinion

Globe Indemnity Co. v. Reinhart

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 4, 1927PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

The appellee (plaintiff below) obtained a judgment against the appellant in the Circuit Court for Allegany County, from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted. The cause of action is an accident policy insuring Boyd A. Beinhart, the husband of the appellee. The policy, which is the contract sued on in this case, is as follows:

“Globe Indemnity Company of New York.
“Policy No. XO-103012. Class No. One.
“Single Indemnity, $ 7,500.00.
“Double Indemnity, $15,000.00.
“Hereby insures the person named in answer 1 of ths schedule of warranties endorsed hereon against loss caused (1) directly and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Cliquot's ChampagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Whitlatch v. . Fidelity and Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. SiefkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Lush v. DruseNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  5. Donovan v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Weis v. WeisOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Loper v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Sims ex rel. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Sims v. Charlotte Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Quimby v. GreenhawkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API