Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Carroll

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1923No. 17931PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

In this action for damages against appellant on account of the death of a minor son of respondent, the amended complaint alleged that death was caused by the negligence of appellant, a drugless physician, in failing to properly diagnose the disease from which the child was suffering, and in failing to give the child proper treatment. A trial to the court and a jury resulted in a verdict and judgment in the sum of $2,500. A motion for a directed verdict had been timely made and denied, and motions were unsuccessfully made for judgment non obstante vere-dicto, and for a new trial.

Appealing,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Nelson v. HarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Force v. GregorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  4. State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Wilkins' Admr. v. BrockSupreme Court of Vermont · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Janssen v. MulderMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Kelly v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Omeitt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Foster v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. State v. LydonWashington Supreme Court · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API