Legal Opinion
Lund v. Olson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 2, 1931No. Nos. 28,167, 28,169PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.
Defendants Fox and Ehlers each appeal from the denial of an alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
This is a personal injury action originally brought against Emmett Olson, Dorothy Fox (hereinafter referred to as Fox), Einar A. Lund, and Fred Ehlers; separate counsel appeared for Olson and Fox and for Lund and Ehlers. At the opening of the trial defendant Einar A. Lund (father of Lenora Lund)- was granted judgment on the pleadings, and the trial proceeded against the other three defendants.
At the close of the evidence a verdict was directed in favor of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Merrill v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Evans v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- McDonough v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Tiedt v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Manning v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
3Cited by15 opinions
- Weis v. WeisOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- Brown v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Klingbeil v. TruesdellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Lund v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- State v. WestonOregon Supreme Court · 1936
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.