State v. Allen

¶1 —Allen appeals his conviction for felony harassment, contending that he did not receive a fair trial because the trial court refused to give his proposed jury instruction on cross-racial eyewitness identification. Allen *732also argues that the prosecutor improperly vouched for the credibility of the complaining witness. Finally, Allen contends that his information and “to convict” instruction were deficient for not containing “true threat” as an element of felony harassment. Finding no error, we affirm.

FACTS

¶2 Gerald Kovacs was walking on University Way near NE 47th Street in the University…