Legal Opinion

Royal Bank of Pennsylvania v. Selig

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 10, 1994No. 2723 and 2762PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Royal Bank of Pennsylvania, the appellant, holds a judgment against Joseph and Tremayne Selig in an amount exceeding six million ($6,000,000.00) dollars. The Seligs are also indebted to Continental Bank for approximately fourteen million, eight hundred thousand ($14,800,000.00) dollars. On or about August 10, 1990, Royal Bank caused a writ of attachment to be issued on its judgment, and this was served on Continental Bank as garnishee. The object of the writ was a custodial account being maintained by the trust department of Continental Bank in which the Seligs, pursuant to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh National Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  2. Aarons v. Pub. Ser. B. L. Assn.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Allied Sheet Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. Peoples National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. Walter v. National City BankOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Aarons v. Public Service Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pioneer Commercial Funding Corp. v. American Financial Mortgage Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Pioneer Commercial Funding Corp. v. American Financial Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. G.A. v. D.L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Korman Commercial Properties, Inc. v. Furniture.com, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Dollar Bank v. Tarbuck (In Re Tarbuck)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API