State v. Blevins
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
In this appeal from convictions of two counts of third-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.344, subd. 1(d) (2002), appellant Edward Blevins argues that because the evidence does not prove that the complainant was unable to withhold consent or to withdraw consent, the evidence is insufficient to support the convictions. We reverse.
FACTS
On October 12, 2003, T.W. went out with her friends in downtown Minneapolis. During the evening, T.W. consumed from ten to twelve alcoholic drinks and became intoxicated. At around 1:30 a.m., T.W. became…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. AltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. Shu Dian PengCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BerriosCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State of Minnesota v. Daniel PiperCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Minnesota v. David Alan WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Juan Jasso, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014