Legal Opinion

State v. Blevins

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 25, 2008No. A07-1397PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

In this appeal from convictions of two counts of third-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.344, subd. 1(d) (2002), appellant Edward Blevins argues that because the evidence does not prove that the complainant was unable to withhold consent or to withdraw consent, the evidence is insufficient to support the convictions. We reverse.

FACTS

On October 12, 2003, T.W. went out with her friends in downtown Minneapolis. During the evening, T.W. consumed from ten to twelve alcoholic drinks and became intoxicated. At around 1:30 a.m., T.W. became…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. State v. AltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. State v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. State v. Shu Dian PengCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BerriosCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  2. State of Minnesota v. Daniel PiperCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  3. State of Minnesota v. David Alan WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  4. State of Minnesota v. Juan Jasso, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API