Legal Opinion

State v. Shu Dian Peng

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 15, 1994No. C0-94-1238PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PHYLLIS GENE JONES, Judge.

This prosecution appeal is from a pretrial order dismissing four counts of an eight-count complaint for lack of probable cause. See State v. Diedrich, 410 N.W.2d 20, 22 (Minn.App.1987) (dismissal for lack of probable cause based on statutory interpretation is appealable). Respondent Shu Dian Peng has filed a cross-appeal from the trial court’s ruling that there is probable cause to charge him with the remaining four counts. We reverse that part of the order dismissing four counts and affirm the refusal to dismiss the remaining counts.

FACTS

Respondent Shu Dian…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ZacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. State v. SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. State v. DiedrichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. State v. PooleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Shreve v. Department of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. BlevinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API