Legal Opinion

State v. Griffith

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1992No. C3-91-263PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

A jury found appellant guilty of two counts of criminal sexual assault in the third degree and one count of criminal sexual assault in the fourth degree. Appellant was sentenced on one of the third-degree counts. The sentencing judge departed upward durationally from the presumptive sentence of 48 months executed to a sentence of 72 months executed. Appellant alleges the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions, the trial court erred in excluding certain evidence, and the sentence departure is not justified. We affirm.

FACTS

The conduct complained of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State v. Van GordenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Ture v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SebaskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. RushNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  3. State v. BlevinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  4. State v. AdellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  5. State v. Morales-MulatoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API