Legal Opinion

People v. Enskat

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 8, 1973No. Crim. 22506PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COLE, J. *

This is a pornography case, here on certification by, the Appellate Department of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County on its own motion. When we accepted the case and ordered it transferred here, we did so primarily to decide whether the municipal court erred in instructing the jury that it could disregard expert testimony of community standards if it found that the conduct in question was so patently offensive as to violate any conceivable community standard.

That question and other issues previously presented in the appeal have now been overshadowed by a new contention…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. People Ex Rel. Busch v. Projection Room TheaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. HortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Bloom v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API