Legal Opinion

Landau v. Fording

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 1966No. Civ. 22920PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The only question presented on this appeal is whether the trial court properly found that “Un Chant d’Amour,” a film written and directed by Jean Genet, was obscene within the meaning of section 311, subdivision (a), of the Penal Code and, therefore, excluded from the constitutional guarantees of freedom of speech and of the press.

The pertinent facts are not in dispute. Appellant, Saul Landau, was authorized by the New York distributor to exhibit the film in the San Francisco Bay Area. Appellant shared the proceeds derived from such exhibitions with the San Francisco Mime Troupe, an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. In Re GianniniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Vernon Walker Huffman v. United States, Dennis Eugene Pryba v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. People v. NoroffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. EnskatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. General Corp. v. State Ex Rel. SweetonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API