Legal Opinion

Heffron v. Los Angeles Transit Lines

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 27, 1959No. Civ. 23379PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

Appellants sued to recover damages for the death of their 12-year-old son who was killed when; in some unexplained manner, he came into contact with a bus owned and operated by respondent Los Angeles Transit Lines. The trial court made findings of fact which included a finding that the operator of the bus was not negligent at the time and place of the accident, i.e., “. . . that at the said time and place the said bus . . . was operated in a careful and prudent manner ...”

Appellants concede the sufficiency of the evidence to support the quoted finding, but on their appeal from the judgment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Holm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hays v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Union Trust Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Manha v. Union Fertilizer Co.California Supreme Court · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. The People v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. State Ex Rel. Cain v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API