Legal Opinion

Houghton v. Department of Health

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1998No. 960349PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice.

The plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s order disqualifying their attorneys, Robert B. Sykes, James D. Vilos, and Matthew H. Raty, and the law firm of Sykes and Vilos, P.C. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Sykes and Vilos”), on the ground that they had a conflict of interest. The complaint challenged the State’s authority to impose Medicaid liens on damages for personal injuries that Medicaid recipients recovered in lawsuits they brought against third parties. The trial court held that Sykes and Vilos had a conflict of interest under Rule 1.9 of the Utah Rules of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Margulies Ex Rel. Margulies v. UpchurchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Slc Limited V, a California Limited Partnership v. Bradford Group West, Inc., a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. Poly Software International, Inc. v. Yu SuDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1995
  5. State v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cheves v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Featherstone v. SchaerrerUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Houghton v. Department of HealthUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. BalfourCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  5. State v. WarehamCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API