Legal Opinion
Featherstone v. Schaerrer
Utah Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 2001No. 990310PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSON, Associate Chief Justice:
T1 Attorney Blake S. Atkin, counsel for plaintiff Steve Featherstone in the dispute underlying this appeal, challenges two trial court orders finding that he violated Utah Rule of Professional Conduct 4.2 and Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 34, and awarding sanctions for his actions. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
BACKGROUND
12 On April 16, 1998, plaintiff Steve Featherstone ("Featherstone") filed suit against two of his business partners, Paul Burt ("Burt") and Grant Schaerrer ("Schaerrer"), and the corporation they had together founded, Thermo…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Niesig v. Team INew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Wright v. Group Health HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Shearn Moody, Jr. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Associated General Contractors v. Board of Oil, Gas & MiningUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- Wilson v. IHC Hospitals, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. LuskUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Division of Forestry, Fire & State Lands v. Tooele CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Pete v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.