Legal Opinion

State v. Larsen

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 7, 1992No. 900473-CAPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BENCH, Presiding Judge:

C. Dean Larsen appeals his conviction of eighteen counts of securities fraud and theft on the ground that the Office of the Utah Attorney General (the Attorney General) should have been disqualified from the case for a conflict of interest. Larsen further asserts that formal investigation into wrongdoing was prompted by disclosure of confidential information from his attorney, and constituted an ethical violation. Larsen also challenges the admissibility of opinion testimony by the State’s expert, the court’s failure to prohibit certain evidence, and its refusal…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. David Owen v. Kerr-Mcgee Corporation and the Home Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Alan Scop, Raphael Bloom, Herbert Stone and Jack RingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. TennysonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  3. Steffensen v. Smith's Management Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Cheves v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API