Legal Opinion

Margulies Ex Rel. Margulies v. Upchurch

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1985No. 19762, 19763 and 19776PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

This is an interlocutory appeal, involving consolidated cases, from an order of the district court denying appellants’ (Up-church, Woolsey, and Chichester) motion to disqualify plaintiffs’ counsel in the case of Margulies v. Upchurch. The plaintiffs have filed a cross-appeal challenging the trial court’s findings regarding the existence of a conflict of interest on the part of plaintiffs’ counsel. We reverse on the appeal and affirm on the cross-appeal.

The law firm of Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough (“Jones, Waldo”) represents the plaintiffs and cross-appellants Margu-lies…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. The Government of India and the Food Corporation of India v. Cook Industries, Inc. And Cook and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  2. Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  3. Trone v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Mitchell A. KRAMER and David C. Harrison v. SCIENTIFIC CONTROL CORP. Et Al. Appeal of ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. EF Hutton & Company v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. In Re RobertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
  3. Bistline v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  4. Cheves v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. GardinerUtah Supreme Court · 1991

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API