Margulies Ex Rel. Margulies v. Upchurch
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
This is an interlocutory appeal, involving consolidated cases, from an order of the district court denying appellants’ (Up-church, Woolsey, and Chichester) motion to disqualify plaintiffs’ counsel in the case of Margulies v. Upchurch. The plaintiffs have filed a cross-appeal challenging the trial court’s findings regarding the existence of a conflict of interest on the part of plaintiffs’ counsel. We reverse on the appeal and affirm on the cross-appeal.
The law firm of Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough (“Jones, Waldo”) represents the plaintiffs and cross-appellants Margu-lies…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- The Government of India and the Food Corporation of India v. Cook Industries, Inc. And Cook and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Trone v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Mitchell A. KRAMER and David C. Harrison v. SCIENTIFIC CONTROL CORP. Et Al. Appeal of ARTHUR ANDERSEN & CO.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- EF Hutton & Company v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- State v. RamirezUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re RobertsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
- Bistline v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Cheves v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. GardinerUtah Supreme Court · 1991
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.