Legal Opinion

State v. Balfour

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided November 14, 2008No. Case No. 20070902-CAPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McHUGH, Judge:

1 Defendant Ozwald Balfour seeks interlocutory review of the trial court's denial of his three motions: (1) Motion to Quash Bind-over; (2) Motion to Sever Counts; and (8) Motion to Disqualify District Attorney's Office. We affirm the trial court's rulings on the first and third motions, and we affirm in part and reverse in part its ruling on the second motion.

BACKGROUND

1 2 On February 8, 2005, the State charged Balfour by information with two counts of forcible sexual abuse, a second degree felony, see Utah Code Ann. § 76-5-404 (2008) (current version as amended at Utah…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. BishopUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. PierreUtah Supreme Court · 1977

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. LabrumCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. State v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  4. State v. PedersenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  5. State v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API