Legal Opinion

A-S-P Associates v. City of Raleigh

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 17, 1978No. 7710SC972PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Judge.

The plaintiff assigns as error the action of the trial court in granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant. In support of this assignment, the plaintiff contends that substantial controversies as to material facts exist which precluded the trial court from granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant. We find this assignment meritorious and must, therefore, reverse the summary judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings.

Upon hearing the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the defendant.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Zopfi v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Helms v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Ivey v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. McArdle Corp. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Laughter v. Southern Pump & Tank Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Barrus Construction Co. v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API