Legal Opinion
Sanders v. Veneman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 14, 2002No. Civil Action 00-1419(RMU)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying The Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of ’Civil Procedure .’56. William Sanders' (“the plaintiff’ or “Mr. Sanders”) brings this suit for damages under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C, § 2000e et seq. The plaintiff claims that his employer, the U.S. Department of. Agriculture, discriminated against him on the basis of his race and retaliated against him after he complained of unlawful, discrimination.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hopkins v. Women's Division, General Board of Global MinistriesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Buggs v. PowellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Calvetti v. AntcliffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Baker v. PotterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Gustave-Schmidt v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.