Legal Opinion
Baker v. Potter
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 2, 2003No. CIV.A. 00-0786(RMU)PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting in Part and Denying in Part the Defendant’s Renewed Motion For Summary Judgment
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Essie Baker brings suit pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., alleging that the defendant, John E. Potter, 1 named in his official capacity as Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service (“the defendant” or “Postal Service”), discriminated against her based on her sex, disability and in retaliation for her prior Equal Employment…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Bell v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Childs-Pierce v. Utility Workers Union of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Edwards v. AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Manuel v. PotterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Kalinoski v. GutierrezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.