Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Newman v. Pagels, Building Inspector

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The principal contentions of the petitioner are that no power is conferred upon the village to enact the ordinances in question, being sec. 15.07 of ordinance No. 161 and ordinance No. 274, and that, if such power be conferred, the ordinances in question are an improper and unreasonable exercise of such power.

Powers of villages are granted and limited by sec. 61.34, Wis. Stats., the applicable parts of which are as follows:

“(11) . . . To regulate the storage,of gunpowder and other dangerous materials; . . .
“(11m) ... To designate general fire limits, and regulate the construction, alteration,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Pierce Oil Corp. v. City of HopeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  3. City of La Crosse v. ElbertsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. Vickers v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State v. BassSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. WahnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Smith v. City of BrookfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State Ex Rel. B'nai B'rith Foundation of the United States v. Walworth County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Geisenfeld v. Village of ShorewoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. State v. MuellerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API