Legal Opinion
Smith v. City of Brookfield
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 7, 1956PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
The zoning ordinance involved, originally adopted by the town of Brookfield and later adopted by the city of Brookfield when the area involved in this litigation was incorporated within the city in 1954, provides in part:
“Whereas, the town board of supervisors of the town of Brookfield deem it necessary in order to provide adequate light, pure air, and safety from fire and other dangers, to conserve the taxable value of land and buildings throughout the township, to avoid congestion in the public streets and highways and to promote the public health, safety, comfort, morals, and welfare, all…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Saveland Park Holding Corp. v. WielandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Mundt v. Sheboygan & Fond du Lac RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- City of Milwaukee v. RuplingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Lerner v. City of DelavanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- City of La Crosse v. ElbertsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- County of Columbia v. BylewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Forest Home Dodge, Inc. v. KarnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Buhler v. Racine CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- State ex rel. Cities Service Oil Co. v. Board of AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.