State v. Mueller
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
The state, as respondent, moves to dismiss this appeal on the ground that no bill of exceptions was settled until September 26, 1935, which was nine months after judgment was rendered, on December 20, 1934. Upon the service of a proposed, bill of exceptions on July 19, 1935, respondent’s counsel promptly objected to the settlement thereof because more than ninety days had elapsed since *437judgment was rendered, and no extension of the time for settling the bill had been granted. The court overruled those objections and settled and signed the bill.
Respondent’s motion to dismiss the appeal must be…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sentell v. New Orleans & Carrollton R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Blair v. ForehandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Van Horn v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Hack v. City of Mineral PointWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Tenney v. LenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- King v. County of ArlingtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- People v. YeoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Holt v. City of Sauk RapidsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Gates v. City of SanfordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- City of Milwaukee v. Milbrew, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.