Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Wahner

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1964PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The first question presented on this appeal is whether the zoning ordinance in effect at the time of the Humble petitions is valid.

In 1947, the town board of Allouez had the power to zone pursuant to authority of sec. 62.23 (7), Stats. This ordinance, like any zoning ordinance, is presumed to be valid and will be set aside only if its invalidity clearly appears.1

*7The ordinance permitted filling stations in a commercial zone only if approved by the zoning board of appeals. When an ordinance vests discretionary power in administrative officials it must prescribe standards to guide their action.2…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Osius v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Ware v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. State ex rel. Cities Service Oil Co. v. Board of AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Smith v. City of BrookfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Lutz v. New Albany City Plan CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. In Re HandySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  2. Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Buhler v. Racine CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Ben Lomond, Inc. v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Quinn v. Town of DodgevilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API