Webster v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Cal.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The appeals presented were taken by the defendant from the judgment and from an order denying it a new trial.
In the complaint and judgment the name of the defendant is stated to be “Board of Regents of the University of the State of California.” The notices of appeal state that the appeals are taken by the defendant and its true name is “Regents of the University of California.” Respondent moves to dismiss the appeals because of this discrepancy, claiming that there is no appeal on behalf of the party named in the complaint and judgment as the defendant. There is no merit in the motion. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. McCreeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Mayrhofer v. Board of Education of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- California Loan & Trust Co. v. WeisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. Doe G. 1,034California Supreme Court · 1868
- Ruperich v. BaehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Turlock Irrigation Dist. v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Hammond v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Connolly v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District v. KlukkertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Newmarker v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.