Call v. City of West Jordan
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Chief Justice:
Plaintiffs John Call and Clark Jenkins, subdividers, brought this action in which they challenge the validity of an ordinance adopted by the defendant City which requires that subdividers dedicate 7 percent of the land to the city, or pay the equivalent of that value in cash, to be used for flood control and/or parks and recreation facilities. The district court upheld the validity of the ordinance and denied plaintiffs’ request for injunctive relief and damages. The latter appeal.
Plaintiffs contend that the ordinance is invalid because: (1) it is not within the City’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ayres v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- ASSOCIATED HOME BUILDERS ETC. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Petterson v. City of NapervilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Billings Properties, Inc. v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1964
- Jenad, Inc. v. Village of ScarsdaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Parks v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Albany Area Builders Ass'n v. Town of GuilderlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Dairy Product Services, Inc. v. City of WellsvilleUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Carter v. Lehi CityUtah Supreme Court · 2012
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.