Legal Opinion

Petterson v. City of Naperville

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1956No. 33939PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Davis

The city of Naperville, defendant, appeals from the judgment and decree of the circuit court of Du Page County finding and declaring that its “Subdivision Control Ordinance,” enacted June 21, 1954, is arbitrary, discriminatory, Unreasonable and void, and restraining and enjoining it from enforcing the provisions of the ordinance against the plaintiffs, Edwin S. Petterson and Dorothy Petterson. The trial court has certified that the validity of a municipal ordinance is involved and that the public interest requires direct appeal.

Count 1, of plaintiffs’ complaint for a declaratory judgment,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. McBrideIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. First Nat. Bank of Lake Forest v. County of LakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Chicago Packing & Provision Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  4. City of Chicago v. LarnedIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  5. 2700 Irving Park Bldg. Corp. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Western National Bank v. Village of KildeerIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Droste v. KernerIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Village of Chatham v. County of SangamonIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People Ex Rel. Keenan v. McGuaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1958

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API