Legal Opinion
State v. Salafia
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided January 20, 1971No. FILE Nos. 8373, 8374, 8375, 8376PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I
Shea, J.
Each of the four defendants has moved to quash the first count of his information, which alleges the crime of perjury in violation of General Statutes § 53-143. The factual basis for the charge as set forth in each information is the testimony given under oath at a hearing before the coroner for New London County on June 12,1969, related to the deaths of Gene and Robert Perkins.
The motions to quash this count filed by each defendant rely upon the claim that the coroner’s hearing, at which the perjury is alleged to have occurred, is not a proceeding to which § 53-143, entitled…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lutz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
- State v. FassetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844
- Commonwealth v. RussoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- State v. SchleiferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- State v. CoffeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cologne v. Westfarms AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Dart & Bogue Co. v. SlosbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- National CSS, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. BlydenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.