Commonwealth v. Russo
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
The appeals of the four defendants from their convictions and sentences in the court below were argued together before us. Although the defendants were tried separately, the charges against them had much in common on the facts and the law. Por this reason their appeals may be disposed of appropriately in this one opinion.
The appellants were police officers of the City of Pittsburgh assigned to a special detail known as the “Vice Squad”. Their duties in the main were to apprehend and prosecute homosexual perverts found principally in the rest rooms of theaters, hotels or…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrennanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Goersen v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
- Commonwealth v. BillingsleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Commonwealth v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Commonwealth v. MalliniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- In Re UllmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. EVANSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. O'BRIENSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Commonwealth v. RussoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Commonwealth v. CodySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.