Legal Opinion

River Towers Ass'n v. McCarthy

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 24, 1992No. C0-91-1872PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AMUNDSON, Judge.

Appellant Daniel McCarthy appeals from a judgment finding him in civil contempt and permanently enjoining him from speaking to River Towers Association officials and security guards except in emergencies or through certain channels. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

Appellant Daniel McCarthy has been a resident of the River Towers Condominiums since 1966. He is also a member of the River Towers Association. River Towers rules prohibit “boisterous, offensive or obnoxious conduct” within the building’s common areas. The parties agree that McCarthy can be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Hopp v. HoppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. State Ex Rel. L.E.A. v. HammergrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Goward v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Robbinsdale Clinic, P.A. v. Pro-Life Action MinistriesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Search Warrant of Columbia Heights v. RozmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Robbinsdale Clinic, P.A. v. Pro-Life Action MinistriesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API