Legal Opinion

Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLC

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 8, 2009No. A09-151PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellants, a developer and its owners, challenge the district court’s determinations that respondent bank was entitled to foreclose its mortgage with appellant developer, that appellant developer is limited to a six-month redemption period, and that respondent bank is entitled to an award of attorney fees and a late-payment fee. We affirm as to the district court’s determination of default, a six-month redemption period, and attorney fees, but we reverse and remand as to the late-payment fee.

FACTS

Appellant JADT Development Company, LLC, a real estate development company…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Melina v. ChaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Anderson v. Twin City Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Marriage of Gully v. GullySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Horodenski v. Lyndale Green Townhome Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Kelbro Co. v. Vinny's On the River, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  3. Doug Hoskin v. Josh KrsnakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  4. In the Matter of the Liquidation of Freestone Insurance CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API