Legal Opinion
Search Warrant of Columbia Heights v. Rozman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 24, 1998No. C3-98-1016PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
This appeal is from an order finding appellant Bennie Rozman, d/b/a Lynde Investments, in civil contempt for failing to comply with orders requiring him to provide structural access to housing inspectors for respondent Columbia Heights (City) who were executing administrative search warrants. We affirm.
FACTS
Rozman owns a number of apartment buildings in Columbia Heights. City, which has a high percentage of rental housing, has enacted a Housing Maintenance Code to ensure that rental units are in satisfactory condition. The code, as amended in 1994, requires annual…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hopp v. HoppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Red River Potato Growers Ass'n v. BernardySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- In Re Contempt of ArmentroutCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- River Towers Ass'n v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McCaughtry v. City of Red WingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012