Legal Opinion
Robbinsdale Clinic, P.A. v. Pro-Life Action Ministries
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 19, 1994No. C1-93-1951Published
1Opinion of the Court
515 N.W.2d 88 (1994)
ROBBINSDALE CLINIC, P.A., Respondent,
v.
PRO-LIFE ACTION MINISTRIES, et al., Defendants,
Lori Driver, Appellant.
No. C1-93-1951.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
April 19, 1994.
Review Denied June 15, 1994.
Marc G. Kurzman, Kurzman, Grant & Ojala, Minneapolis, for respondent, Robbinsdale Clinic, P.A.,
Barry William McKee, Stillwater, for appellant Lori Driver.
Considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and LANSING and SCHUMACHER, JJ.
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Following a hearing before the district court, appellant Lori Driver was found in contempt for communicating with a patient of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.