Legal Opinion

Fogarty v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 5, 1935PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The defendant issued to the plaintiff a policy upon an automobile truck owned by him, insuring him “against loss on account of damages to, or loss of,” the automobile, “including operating equipment while attached thereto, if caused by collision with any object or by upset (excluding damage by fire, tire damage unless other damage is coincident, and any loss or damage caused directly or indirectly by any accident excluded under the policy as a cause of bodilyy injury or death).” According to the finding of the trial court, with certain minor changes which the plaintiff is entitled to have…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Waters v. Merchants' Louisville InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  2. Peters v. Warren InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  3. Insurance Co. v. Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Harris v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  5. Russell v. German Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Moffet v. Kansas City Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  2. G & R Tire Distributors, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. O'Brien v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  4. King v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Terrien v. Pawtucket Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API