Legal Opinion
Harty v. Eagle Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 18, 1928PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.
The plaintiff, having secured a judgment against one Mabel E. Haskell on account of injuries caused by negligence in the operation of an automobile owned by her, brings this action under the provisions of Chapter 331 of the Public Acts of 1919, to recover the amount of that judgment from the defendant, which had issued to Miss Haskell a policy of insurance agreeing to indemnify her against loss arising out of such a liability as that involved in the judgment. The plaintiff alleged that Miss Haskell had duly performed all the conditions of the policy incumbent upon her and to this allegation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hennessy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
- Chambers v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Vincent v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Asso.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Benanti v. Delaware InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Sortito v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Frager v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- DuBose v. CarabettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Pawlinski v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Rochon v. Preferred Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. Of N. Y. v. GrassoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.