Legal Opinion

Peerless Oil & Gas Co. v. Tipken

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 7, 1942No. 30114PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Lincoln county wherein the trial court sustained the demurrer of the defendants to the petition of the plaintiff.

The plaintiff alleged that the defendant Louis Tipken was the owner in fee simple of the W.% of the N.W. 14 of sec. 15, twp. 13 N., range 6E., Lincoln county, Okla.; that on January 11, 1927, for a valuable consideration, he, together with his wife, executed and delivered to the plaintiff a mineral deed conveying, for a term of 15 years and as long thereafter as oil and gas may be produced, an undivided one-half interest in and to all…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. South Penn Oil Co. v. SnodgrassWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Pierce Oil Corporation v. SchachtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Wettengel v. GormleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Kimbley v. LuckeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Parker v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Southland Royalty Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Leonard v. BarnesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Stroud v. D-X Sunray Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  4. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Southland Royalty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Moshiek v. LiningerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API