Legal Opinion

Republic Natural Gas Co. v. Baker

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 11, 1952No. 4403PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

Abstractly stated, the question presented by this appeal is whether, under Kansas law, the owner or owners of mineral interests under separate tracts of land covered by one oil and gas lease, are entitled to participate pro rata in the royalty from a well drilled on one of the tracts; or whether, as the trial court held, the owner or owners of the mineral interest under the separate tract on which the well was drilled are entitled to all of the royalties from such well. The question is presented on these facts.

In 1930, T. G. Hicks and wife executed an oil and gas lease…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hunter Co. v. McHughSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  2. Hunter Co. v. McHughSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Palmer Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Marrs v. City of OxfordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
  5. Crichton v. LeeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  2. Hunter v. HusseyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Nale v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Anadarko Production Co. v. TaylorDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1982
  5. Ryan Consol. Petroleum Corp. v. PickensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API