Legal Opinion

P.L.S. Coat & Suit Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 20, 1960No. 213-56, 513-56PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

In these cases plaintiffs seek to recover extra costs alleged to have been incurred in manufacturing raincoats under contracts with the Department of the Navy. Each plaintiff had two contracts under which claims have been made. Plaintiffs allege that their costs were increased because the raincoat material which was furnished by the Government was not in conformity with contract specifications and was otherwise defective.

Defendant has moved for summary judgments dismissing plaintiffs’ petitions on the grounds (1) that plaintiffs’ claims are barred because of their failure to comply with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Volentine and Littleton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  4. Poloron Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  2. River Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  3. Anthony P. Miller, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. Aircraft Associates & Mfg. Co., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  5. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API