Legal Opinion
Poloron Products, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 1, 1953No. 48997PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LITTLETON, Judge.
Plaintiff, a New York corporation with its principal place of business at New Rochelle, New York, brings this suit to recover an alleged loss of $64,110.58 which it contends resulted from the wrongful acts of the defendant in partially terminating a contract under which plaintiff agreed to manufacture for the Quartermaster Corps of the Army a quantity of stainless steel canteens. 1 Pursuant to Rule 38(c), Rules of Court of Claims, 28 U.S.C.A. and a stipulation of the parties, the only question now presented is on the issue of liability.
In answer to invitations to bid issued…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. WunderlichSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- W. E. Callahan Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Franklin E. Penny Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Moran Bros., Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- P.L.S. Coat & Suit Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- General Injectables & Vaccines, Inc. v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- General Injectables & Vaccines, Inc. v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.