Legal Opinion

Knox v. Higby

California Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1888No. 9726PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Calaveras County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The action was brought to quiet title to a tract of mining ground in Calaveras County, as against an adverse claim asserted thereto by the defendant under a certificate of sale for taxes. The complaint alleged that upon the assessment roll the assessor described the property as follows: — “‘BOSTON QTZ.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Calaveras County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The action was brought to quiet title to a tract of mining ground in Calaveras County, as against an adverse claim asserted thereto by the defendant under a certificate of sale for taxes. The complaint alleged that upon the assessment roll the assessor described the property as follows: — “‘BOSTON QTZ. MINE,) KNOX and OSBORN, [ R. F. J. ) “‘Owp. of a certain Qtz. mine or lode, being mineral entry No. 626, designated by the surveyor-general as lot No. 44, embracing a portion— Mt. Diablo B.…

1Opinion of the Court

Foote, C.

This action was brought to quiet the plaintiff’s title to property which the defendant had bought at a certain tax sale, and for which he held a certificate of purchase. The plaintiffs had judgment, from which, and an order refusing a new trial, the defendant appeals.

From the findings, which are, we think, supported by sufficient evidence, it appears that the assessment under which the sale took place was upon a certain quartz mine described by metes and bounds, and upon a mill and other improvements which were not situated upon the land which included the mine. In other words, that *267a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harper v. RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Bucknall v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Axtell v. GerlachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Boston Tunnel Co. v. McKenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Treadwell v. PattersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cushing v. PiresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Stege v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Hotchkiss v. HansbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Stover v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. In Re RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API