Legal Opinion

In Re Rogers

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1928No. Docket No. 6142PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barney Judge filed a petition to register certain lands under the Land Title Act. (2 Deering's General Laws 1923, p. 3611.) The defendant Grace P. Warden appeared and answered. A trial was had before the trial court sitting without a jury. The trial court made findings of fact in favor of the petitioner. From a judgment entered thereon the defendant Grace P. Warden has appealed under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The plaintiff Barney Judge holds a purported tax title. If the tax deed under which he claims is valid, the judgment should be affirmed, otherwise it should be reversed.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bucknall v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Bussenius v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Boston Tunnel Co. v. McKenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Numitor Gold Mining Co. v. KatzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Stuart v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Otis v. Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Knoke v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Redman v. NewellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. State ex rel. Cranston v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API