Legal Opinion
Filipczyk v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 2, 2009No. 09-045CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
This is a civilian pay suit in which pro se Plaintiff Rafal Filipezyk again seeks reimbursement from his employer, the Naval Oceanographic Office (“NAVO”), for lodging expenses of $175.17 incurred when he rented a hotel room after the ship to which he was assigned on temporary duty docked in Japan. NAVO denied him payment based on a provision in the Collective Bargaining Agreement (“CBA”) that governs his employment prohibiting reimbursement of hotel expenses for the first 48 hours in which a ship is in port. Mr. Filipezyk has now filed suit in the Court of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Klingenschmitt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Corrigan v. National Treasury Employees UnionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Corrigan v. National Treasury Employees UnionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010