Fanger v. Caspary
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Waldemar Oaspary, doing business under the name of Benjamin & Oaspary, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 30th day of March, 1903, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 27th day of March, 1903, denying' the defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.
1Opinion of the Court
Hatch, J.:
The complaint avers that the plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract on or about the 5th day of January, 1900, wherein the defendant agreed to employ the plaintiff to work for him until the 1st day of January, 1901; that the plaintiff entered upon the employment under the contract, and continued to work thereunder until the 5th day of May, 1900, when he was discharged without cause. He asks to recover damages in the sum of $500. The answer avers that the plaintiff entered into defendant’s employ under a written contract,'which expressly provided that he was to be employed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Southwick v. First National Bank of MemphisNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Crane v. . PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Wahl v. . BarnumNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Purdy v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburgh RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Simpson v. New York Rubber Co.New York Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Union Savings & Trust Co. v. KrummWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Pocket v. AlmonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
- Williamsburg City Fire Insurance v. LichtensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Williamsburg City Fire Insurance v. LichtensteinNew York Supreme Court · 1916
- Bennett v. MahlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.